<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tim O'Keefe &#187; Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timokeefe.net/tag/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timokeefe.net</link>
	<description>Tim O'Keefe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 03:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Social Media Even Media?</title>
		<link>http://www.timokeefe.net/2008/11/24/is-social-media-even-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timokeefe.net/2008/11/24/is-social-media-even-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timokeefe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timokeefe.net/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Tweet This PostThe Eisenbergs consider if we should even call it media.
I kind of agree. Is Twitter really media? Doesn&#8217;t media kind of imply  some sort of tighter organization?
Most striking in the linked article is this quote from Ted McConnellof P&#38;G:
We hijack their own conversations, their own thoughts and feelings, and try to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike" style="height:auto; height:25px; overflow:hidden;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.timokeefe.net%2F2008%2F11%2F24%2Fis-social-media-even-media%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allow Transparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;"></iframe></div><p></p><div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Is+Social+Media+Even+Media%3F+http%3A%2F%2Ftimokeefe.net%2F%3Fp%3D5" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.timokeefe.net/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Is+Social+Media+Even+Media%3F+http%3A%2F%2Ftimokeefe.net%2F%3Fp%3D5" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div><p>The Eisenbergs consider if we should even call it <a href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/2008/11/18/social-media-is-not-media/">media</a>.</p>
<p>I kind of agree. Is Twitter really media? Doesn&#8217;t media kind of imply  some sort of tighter organization?</p>
<p>Most striking in the linked article is this quote from Ted McConnellof P&amp;G:</p>
<p><em>We hijack their own conversations, their own thoughts and feelings, and try to monetize it.”&#8230;</em><em>“You can do really amazing things. But I’m not so sure I want to be targeted like that. … I don’t think everything every consumer says to someone else and writes down is somehow monetizable by the media industry.”</em></p>
<p>Interesting. I have often felt at times (although wrongly so), that the only conversations were commercial in nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timokeefe.net/2008/11/24/is-social-media-even-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

